đ§ŸTHE 52% SOLUTION
Ananias and Sapphira sold a piece of property and laid the proceeds at the apostlesâ feet â all while holding some back and claiming it was the full amount. The crime, Peter explained before they both dropped dead, was not the holdback. It was the pretending. Acts 5.
Yesterday, NewsChannel 5 investigative journalist â and noted âSpeed-ohâ enthusiast â Phil Williams, who is no friend of Tennessee conservatives, reported that Congressman Andy Ogles (R-TN5) held a press conference attempting to explain away years of questions surrounding the long-abandoned âLincolnâs Placeâ GoFundMe fundraiser originally created after the death of his infant son.
During that press conference, Ogles casually rewrote twelve years of his own public story.
Quote, with emphasis added: âWhen it comes to the burial ground, you know, 52% OF THE MONEY IN THAT FUND CAME FROM MYSELF AND MY WIFE, THE REST OF IT CAME FROM MY FAMILY... We ultimately used that money instead of burial grounds TO HELP PRIMARILY CHILDREN WITH CANCER.â
âFifty-two percentâ is the kind of number somebody calculates.
Ogles stood at a podium yesterday and claimed that he and his wife personally contributed $12,204.40 to a GoFundMe organized by Andy and Monica Ogles themselves. The remaining $11,265.60, according to Ogles, came from family. None of it, he says, came from the public.
That explanation works just fine⊠until somebody opens the archive.
TO THE WAYBACK MACHINE
The original âLincolnâs Placeâ GoFundMe page is still sitting in the Wayback Machine, preserved in four separate archive captures between March 6 and March 11, 2014. And those archives tell a story that becomes increasingly awkward the longer yesterdayâs press conference is examined.
Back in 2014, the campaign was publicly listed with a $40,000 fundraising goal and shared to Andrew Oglesâs 1,078 Facebook friends. By the time it closed, the page reflected at least 139 separate donations totaling roughly $23,470. The donations were not vague or anonymous blobs. They were itemized with names, amounts, condolence messages, timestamps, and donation methods. Some were marked offline. Most were online. None of them â anywhere on the archived page â listed âAndrew Oglesâ or âMonica Oglesâ as contributors.
The public nature of the fundraiser was not subtle, either. Hugh Lincoln Oglesâs obituary through Williamson Memorial Funeral Home directed mourners straight to the GoFundMe page itself. In other words, strangers were publicly invited to donate money over the internet to a stated cause. That is the opposite of a private family fund.
And then there is the Mark Green issue.
Among the archived donors sits a $200 contribution from Green, timestamped March 10, 2014. At the time, he was a sitting Tennessee state senator, later Congressman for TN-7, and most recently chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. The donation remains archived and publicly accessible to anyone with an internet connection and ten free minutes.
The receipts were not hidden away in some dark corner of the internet. They have been sitting in plain sight for over a decade â a detail Ogles appears to have lost track of.
LETâS DO SOME MATH
52% of $23,470 is $12,204.40 â the amount Ogles now claims he and his wife personally placed into this GoFundMe. Twelve years later, there is still no canceled check, screenshot, transfer receipt, bank statement, or even a PayPal confirmation supporting that claim.
So the public is left with a sitting member of Congress offering an extraordinarily precise figure while producing exactly zero documentation to support it â despite having a paid communications staff and twelve years to locate a receipt.
Federal fraud statutes exist for situations where money is solicited online for one stated purpose and later described very differently. The original 2014 conduct is well outside any obvious five-year limitations window. Statements made to federal investigators, however, operate on a different timeline. And the explanation here has changed repeatedly.
The archive, meanwhile, does show a single $50 offline donation connected to a surname appearing in the obituary family list.
The rest of the donor pool is broad, varied, and plainly public â dozens upon dozens of individuals leaving condolence messages, many with surnames entirely unconnected to the family, including several commenters who indicated they did not personally know the Ogles family at all.
In 2026, that now appears to qualify as family.
FOUR STORIES, TWELVE YEARS, NO RECEIPTS
Over the past twelve years, the story behind Lincolnâs Place has changed enough times that the revisions themselves are beginning to overshadow the original fundraiser.
Back in 2014, donors were told the money would purchase twenty burial sites for children along with a life-size statue of Jesus. A year later, Ogles explained to The Tennessean that none of the money had actually been spent because burial projects were âheavily regulated.â By 2023, the purpose had apparently âevolvedâ into helping grieving families directly with funeral expenses.
Then came yesterdayâs press conference, where things took another turn.
It bears repeating: Ogles explained that 52% of the money had supposedly come from him and Monica personally, with the remainder coming from family members. Then, only moments later, the fund was described as having primarily helped children with cancer â a purpose that does not appear in the earlier public descriptions of Lincolnâs Place and seems to have arrived somewhere around version four.
Monroe Carell Jr. Childrenâs Hospital at Vanderbilt and St. Jude both maintain donor acknowledgment records going back decades. Either institution could confirm, with a single phone call, whether it ever received a gift connected to Andy Ogles, Monica Ogles, or anything called Lincolnâs Place. To public knowledge, neither institution has confirmed receiving one.
Asked yesterday about the broader cluster of campaign-finance and rĂ©sumĂ© controversies surrounding him, Ogles told reporters: âWhat they find doesnât matter because the story is already written. The truth doesnât matter,â which is the most honest sentence Ogles has uttered about any of this in twelve years.
THE PART THAT WONâT GO AWAY
And the truth is, this is not even the first time Congressman Ogles has found himself trying to explain mysterious numbers, missing documentation, or accounting stories that seem to shift depending on who is asking the questions. Just last week, there was genuine admiration for the manâs apparent political survival skills. At some point, after enough investigations, amended filings, disappearing explanations, and contradictory timelines, a person either becomes the unluckiest bookkeeper in modern Tennessee politics or somebody extraordinarily skilled at skidding through controversy by inches.
But this story lands differently because it involves a child.
The Lord gave Hugh Lincoln Ogles two days on this earth. His name is real, and it deserves dignity. His parents have now had twelve years to handle that name carefully and honestly before the public they asked to contribute money in his memory.
That is the part that will not go away.


